Hey Jim, On 22/10/12 17:43, Jim Rees wrote: > Steve Dickson wrote: > > To ensure the code compiles cleaner, the following warning options > are now set > -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict-prototypes -Wstrict-aliasing > -Wconversion -Wsign-conversion -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wsign-conversion -pedantic -Wmissing-prototypes > > You only need to specify them once. You've got sign-conversion and > missing-prototypes twice. Yeah... I noticed that after I posted the patch... This was more of an RFC patch than anything... I just wanted to get people's opinion... > Also I think -pedantic is going too far. Why? The one patch its used for does the following: -gss_OID g_mechOid = GSS_C_NULL_OID;; +gss_OID g_mechOid = GSS_C_NULL_OID; Which seems reasonable... What do you see that I don't? steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
