An EAGAIN return value would be unexpected, but there is no reason to
BUG...
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 68b21d8..16190b4 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5571,8 +5571,8 @@ static void nfs4_get_lease_time_prepare(struct rpc_task *task,
&data->args->la_seq_args,
&data->res->lr_seq_res, task);
- BUG_ON(ret == -EAGAIN);
- rpc_call_start(task);
+ if (ret != -EAGAIN)
+ rpc_call_start(task);
dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
