2012/7/27, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:15:23 +0900 > Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Jeff. >> >> Which testcase(or test method) do I use to know improved point from >> ESTALE error ? >> I want to know before & after using testcase with this patch-set. >> > > It's a bit labor intensive, I'm afraid... > > Attached is a cleaned-up copy of the test program that Peter wrote to > test his original patchset. The basic idea is to run this on both the > client and server at the same time so they race against each other. He > was able to run it overnight when testing with his patchset. > > With this patchset, that doesn't work since we're only retrying the > lookup and call once. So, what I've been doing is modifying the program > so that it just runs one test at a time, and sniffing traffic to see > whether the lookups and calls are retried after an ESTALE return from > the server. Sorry for late response. I will check this patch with testcase you shared. Thanks Jeff. > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
