On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:03:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > 28.07.2012 01:54, J. Bruce Fields пишет: > >On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:55:45PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > >>Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion. > >> > >>v2: > >>1) Rebase on Bruce's "for-3.6" branch. > >> > >>This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace > >>aware. > > > >On a quick skim--yes, that looks reasonable to me. > > > >It doesn't help with active/active cluster exports, because in that case > >we need some additional coordination between nfsd's. > > > >But it looks good enough to handle the case where each filesystem is > >exported from at most one server at a time, which is more than we > >currently handle. > > > >It's a little late for 3.6. Also I get the impression Al Viro has some > >lockd rework in progress, which we may want to wait for. > > > >So I'll likely look again into queueing this up for 3.7 once 3.6-rc1 is > >out. > > > Ok. > Will Al Viro's lockd rework be a part of 3.6 kernel? Actually I think it mostly won't be. And this looks pretty safe, really. I've gone ahead and merged it. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
