On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:17:39PM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote: > For removing storage device - user needs to safely un-mount the device > and then eject. But if 'EBUSY' occurs in umount then it will create > confusion for the user as it will mean some I/O is in progress - and > won't allow user to safely ejecting device. The one drawback is that recovering from the cache flushes might be a little expensive if you have a lot of exports in use. I'm curious, since you said this was for a usb disk: are users expected to just unplug it (in which case--is it read only?) or do they have some way of unmounting before they pull the plug? --b. > > 1. Without this patch: > > On NFS Client: > $ mount.nfs <NFS_SERVER>:/mnt /mnt > $ umount.nfs /mnt > > On NFS Server: > $ umount /mnt > umount: can't umount /mnt: Device or resource busy > > 2. With this patch: > > On NFS Client: > $ mount.nfs <NFS_SERVER>:/mnt /mnt > $ umount.nfs /mnt > > On NFS Server: > $ umount.nfs /mnt --> umount successful > > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Trivedi <vtrivedi018@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > utils/mountd/mountd.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/utils/mountd/mountd.c b/utils/mountd/mountd.c > index bcf5080..2b190fb 100644 > --- a/utils/mountd/mountd.c > +++ b/utils/mountd/mountd.c > @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ mount_umnt_1_svc(struct svc_req *rqstp, dirpath *argp, void *UNUSED(resp)) > return 1; > > mountlist_del(host_ntop(sap, buf, sizeof(buf)), p); > + cache_flush(1); > return 1; > } > > @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ mount_umntall_1_svc(struct svc_req *rqstp, void *UNUSED(argp), > auth_reload(); > > mountlist_del_all(nfs_getrpccaller(rqstp->rq_xprt)); > + cache_flush(1); > return 1; > } > > -- > 1.7.9.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
