Re: Kernel NFSd CPU hog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02.07.2012 21:07, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:43:48 +0200
Andreas Heinlein <aheinlein@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

we have a strange NFS problem with a newly setup Linux server, and I
hope someone here can help.

The symptom is that, slowly over time (speaking of several days up to 2
weeks), the kernel nfsd processes/threads consume more and more CPU
until the system finally becomes unresponsive. We recorded system
activity with sar, which shows that CPU (system) usage slowly rises
after reboot from about 1% to nearly 100% over the course of several
days. Load averages stay around 0.1-0.3 until 100% are reached, up to
this point the problem is almost not noticable from the clients. Then
load averages climb up to 30.0; at this point the system becomes more or
less unusable and has to be restarted. 'top' output shows the CPU usage
evenly distributed across all nfsd threads.

The system is a fairly recent, though entry level server with a Core i3
and 4G RAM, hosting the home directories for about 15-20 clients. CPU
activity does not drop at night, when no clients are connected. It is
running Debian 6.0 with linux 3.2.0 (from the backports repository),
with nfs-utils 1.2.5 (also from the backports repository). I suspect
that these backports might be the culprit, but since we need this kernel
for other purposes, and I cannot reboot that machine during office
hours, I'd rather not try going back to the official Debian kernel
without good reasons. If there are known problems, I'd give it a try.

Find the pid of one of the nfsd threads that's spinning, then get a
stack trace from it:

     # cat /proc/<pidofnfsd>/stack

...that should give us some idea of what it's doing.

--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello,

I've run into the problem again, and did a 'watch cat /proc/<pidofnfsd>/stack'. It actually seems to be doing something, because the stack trace changes every now and then, but mostly looks like

[<c1038be2>] try_to_wake_up+0x144/0x14d
[<c1045d26>] lock_timer_base+0x19/0x34
[<c10462fd>] __mod_timer+0x10c/0x116
[<c1045d41>] process_timeout+0x0/0x5
[<f858a243>] svc_recv+0x2e2/0x698 [sunrpc]
[<c1038beb>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x8
[<f8640748>] nfsd+0x90/0x108 [nfsd]
[<f86406b8>] nfsd+0x0/0x108 [nfsd]
[<c105176b>] kthread+0x63/0x68
[<c1051708>] kthread+0x0/0x68
[<c12dadbe>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

Meanwhile, I've found a quite recent thread on this list named "3.0+ NFS issues", and within two links to Ubuntu bug reports (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/879334 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1006446) and again to a kernel bug (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40912), all suggesting that this is indeed a kernel 3.0 problem.

So I will try going back to 2.6.32 and hope this issue gets fixed soon.

Thanks for your help!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux