Hi Namjae,
I'm glad you also see the usefulness of sending such hints to the NFS
server.
Beyond reviewing the NFSv4.2 spec, it would also be very useful to
implement a version of IO_ADVISE and show performance results with your
traverse test (among others). If you have time for this, that would
really be helpful in ensuring the usefulness of IO_ADVISE.
Dean Hildebrand
On 6/24/12 6:54 PM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
2012/6/24, Jim Rees <rees@xxxxxxxxx>:
Namjae Jeon wrote:
> Yes, posix_fadvise support is part of NFSv4.2.
Where can I check it ?
Thanks.
NFS is standardized throught the IETF. 4.2 is not out yet, so you'll find
it in the drafts rather than the RFCs. You can search them here:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/idsearch.html
Here is the current draft:
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-12.txt
Okay, I will check, Thanks a lot Jim~. We hope to contribute NFSv4.2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
