Re: [PATCH 0/4] Take 2: TEST_STATEID fix-ups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi-

Do you think these are ready for nfs-for-3.6 ?


On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:

> For review.
> 
> I discovered a few problems with the new TEST_STATEID implementation
> while testing nograce recovery.  Review comments have been addressed,
> and these have been rebased on 3.5-rc2.
> 
> ---
> 
> Chuck Lever (4):
>      NFS: Refactor nfs41_check_expired_stateid()
>      NFS: State reclaim clears OPEN and LOCK state
>      NFS: Properly sort TEST_STATEID results
>      NFS: Clean up TEST_STATEID and FREE_STATEID proc error reporting
> 
> 
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |  146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> Chuck Lever
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux