On 06/11/2012 05:21 PM, Adamson, Andy wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: > >> On 2012-06-11 13:44, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> Basically my plan is to postpone the LAYOUTRETURN send to >>> when the segment is last referenced, if a flag was set to >>> do so, and make sure reference counting is done proper, so >>> after flag set the last IO_done will send the LAYOUTRETURN. >>> >>> If that is OK with all I hope? >> >> Sounds OK to me. Thanks! > > Sounds fine to me as well, for LAYOUTRETURN during normal behavior. > > -->Andy I'm not sure I understood what you meant. In the "normal behavior" we don't send a LAYOUTRETURN at all in the forgetful model. Which proved beneficiary in the light of concurrent GETs vs RETURNs. I thought we are only taking about the error case. Do you mean there is a 3rd case? please explain. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
