On 05/28/2012 08:55 PM, Benny Halevy wrote: > On 2012-05-28 19:36, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 05/28/2012 07:05 PM, Benny Halevy wrote: >> >>> Yup, see patchset in reply. >>> >> >> >> That I wish you wouldn't do. I have a patchset pending that makes >> major changes to all this and totally conflicts with your code. > > Sorry, I didn't know that. > >> >> You can carry this for a while but I might revert your core >> code in my new patchset. > > I hope that at least it will all be for the better. > > Benny > NP. Yes it is all for the better. I think you'll like what I did. BTW after I finish implementing my stuff. I think it would be easy to implement that open_state_id thing. All we need is to save the open_state_id somewhere per-file or somehow identify it's receive, And then just call nfs4_roc() which will do the proper work. But please wait for me to finish. (It is all done and debugged, but will be divided and patched on Wednesday) Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
