On 22.05.2012 18:45, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 18:41 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
On 22.05.2012 18:37, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 12:03 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/client.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
index 44cd70f..ae29d4f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
@@ -176,8 +176,10 @@ static struct nfs_client *nfs_alloc_client(const struct nfs_client_initdata *cl_
#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4
err = nfs_get_cb_ident_idr(clp, cl_init->minorversion);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ put_net(clp->net);
goto error_cleanup;
+ }
spin_lock_init(&clp->cl_lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&clp->cl_renewd, nfs4_renew_state);
Let's just move the actual get_net() call to the end of the function.
Ok. But it will look a bit strange, like this:
clp->net = net;
...
nfs_get_cb_ident_idr
...
get_net(clp->net)
Or I can pass net to nfs_get_cb_ident_idr() as a parameter.
Which solution is more preferable&?
Just put the get_net() at the end. It doesn't matter if it looks a bit
odd: the intent is still obvious.
Sure.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
