On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:06:30PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:21:30PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > > This patch set is marked with RFC, because I'm still not quite sure, that this > > implementation will satisfy other interested people. > > So, would be appreciated for any comments. > > > > This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace > > aware. > > > > Main ideas: > > 1) moving of > > > > unsigned long next_gc; > > unsigned long nrhosts; > > > > struct delayed_work grace_period_end; > > struct lock_manager lockd_manager; > > struct list_head grace_list; > > > > to per-net Lockd data. > > > > 2) moving of > > > > struct lock_manager nfsd4_manager; > > > > to per-net NFSd data. > > > > 3) shutdown + gc of NLM hosts done now network namespace aware. > > That all sounds reasonable to me. > > > 4) restart_grace() now works only for init_net. > > Eventually we might just remove that. I doubt it's used anywhere. And on a quick skim I don't see anything wrong with the patches themselves; let me know when you consider them ready. The per-net grace period management probably isn't what we'll want eventually, but as I said on the other thread I think it's a reasonable starting point. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
