On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 10:59 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > OK, but fyi, there's a possible issue with !CONFIG_DEBUG > builds because these patches converted some uses of > if (net_ratelimit()) > printk(KERN_DEBUG ... > to > net_dbg_ratelimited() > > These messages are no longer emitted when DEBUG isn't defined > and not using dynamic_debug. I'm not sure that's a real > problem, but it's a difference. > > I could produce a net_printk_ratelimited that would keep > the original behavior if necessary. > > net_printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG etc...) Btw, what would the difference be to just plain printk_ratelimited()? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
