Re: extremely slow nfs when sync enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/05/12 09:26, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> 
> 
> I've been observing some very slow nfs write performance when the server
> has `sync' in /etc/exports
> 
> I want to avoid using async, but I have tested it and on my gigabit
> network, it gives almost the same speed as if I was on the server
> itself. (e.g. 30MB/sec to one disk, or less than 1MB/sec to the same
> disk over NFS with `sync')

Just to clarify this point: if I log in to the server and run one of my
tests (e.g. untar the linux source), it is very fast, iostat shows
30MB/sec write)

Also, I've tried write-back cache (hdparm -W 1), when this is enabled
NFS writes go from about 1MB/sec up to about 10MB/sec, but still way
below the speed of local disk access on the server.

> 
> I'm using Debian 6 with 2.6.38 kernels on client and server, NFSv3
> 
> I've also tried a client running Debian 7/Linux 3.2.0 with both NFSv3
> and NFSv4, speed is still slow
> 
> Looking at iostat on the server, I notice that avgrq-sz = 8 sectors
> (4096 bytes) throughout the write operations
> 
> I've tried various tests, e.g. dd a large file, or unpack a tarball with
> many small files, the iostat output is always the same
> 
> Looking at /proc/mounts on the clients, everything looks good, large
> wsize, tcp:
> 
> rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.x.x.x,mountvers=3,mountport=58727,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.x.x.x
> 0 0
> 
> and
>  rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=192.x.x.x.,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=192.x.x.x 0 0
> 
> and in /proc/fs/nfs/exports on the server, I have sync and wdelay:
> 
> /nfs4/daniel
> 192.168.1.0/24,192.x.x.x(rw,insecure,root_squash,sync,wdelay,no_subtree_check,uuid=aa2a6f37:9cc94eeb:bcbf983c:d6e041d9,sec=1)
> /home/daniel
> 192.168.1.0/24,192.x.x.x(rw,root_squash,sync,wdelay,no_subtree_check,uuid=aa2a6f37:9cc94eeb:bcbf983c:d6e041d9)
> 
> Can anyone suggest anything else?  Or is this really the performance hit
> of `sync'?
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux