From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@xxxxxxxxxx>
We don't want to return -NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC to the VFS because it could
cause the kernel to oops.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 60d5f4c..0de2614 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -4919,7 +4919,7 @@ static void nfs_fixup_referral_attributes(struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
fattr->nlink = 2;
}
-int nfs4_proc_fs_locations(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name,
+static int _nfs4_proc_fs_locations(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name,
struct nfs4_fs_locations *fs_locations, struct page *page)
{
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(dir);
@@ -4959,6 +4959,19 @@ int nfs4_proc_fs_locations(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name,
return status;
}
+int nfs4_proc_fs_locations(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name,
+ struct nfs4_fs_locations *fs_locations, struct page *page)
+{
+ struct nfs4_exception exception = { };
+ int err;
+ do {
+ err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir),
+ _nfs4_proc_fs_locations(dir, name, fs_locations, page),
+ &exception);
+ } while (exception.retry);
+ return err;
+}
+
static int _nfs4_proc_secinfo(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name, struct nfs4_secinfo_flavors *flavors)
{
int status;
--
1.7.10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
