Re: global openowner_id and lockowner_id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 11:54 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 11:42 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> Hi-
> >> 
> >> Changing the SETCLIENTID boot verifier so it is global for the whole client exposes a problem with how we allocate state owners.
> >> 
> >> A quick umount / mount sequence destroys all state on the client.  But since the client now always uses the same boot verifier and nfs_client_id4 string, the server no longer recognizes a client reboot.  FOr a fresh mount, the client may perform a SETCLIENTID, but it is treated as a callback update (state is not purged) if the client's lease has not yet expired.
> >> 
> >> Our state owners are generated from a pair of ida structures in the nfs_server for that mount.  They always start from zero after a mount operation.  Likewise, the sequence IDs for these state owners are also reset by umount / mount.  Note that each mount point gets a fresh nfs_server, so these structures are not retained across umount / mount.
> >> 
> >> This means umount / mount with no lease expiry starts to re-play state owners with reset sequence IDs.  Servers don't really care for that behavior.  I have a test case that reliably gets a BAD_SEQID error from a server after a quick umount / mount followed by a single file creation.
> >> 
> >> Now that we are about to switch to using more-or-less global SETCLIENTID boot verifiers, it seems to me that we really want a global openowner_id and lockowner_id as well.
> >> 
> >> The performance impact of such a change might be acceptable because we cache and reuse state owners now.
> >> 
> >> Thoughts?
> > 
> > That's a definite server bug. If the client holds no open state, then it
> > is allowed to forget the open owner and start the sequence id from 0
> > again. It is not required to remember sequence ids for open owners that
> > aren't in use.
> > 
> > Our current client could easily trigger this bug even without a
> > umount/mount.
> 
> The client is holding open state.  Here's the exact reproducer on my modified client:
> 
> 1.  mount server:/export /mnt
> 2.  touch /mnt/newfile
> 3.  umount /mnt
> 4.  mount server:/export /mnt
> 5.  touch /mnt/newfile2
> 
> Step 5 causes the client to replay an open owner with a reset sequence ID, and the server replies BAD_SEQID.

touch won't keep the file open. There is no open state once touch has
finished executing.

What you have exposed above is a _server_ bug. The server is _not_
allowed to assume that the client will cache an open owner forever once
it no longer holds any open state using that open owner. We had a loong
discussion about this on the mailing list a few years ago with David
Robinson being the person who formulated the above rule.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux