On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:24:52PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > 11.04.2012 22:22, J. Bruce Fields написал: > >>> What would happen, if we will have situation like below: > >>> > mountd A mountd B > >>> > pid_ns pid_ns > >>> | | > >>> mnt_ns mnt_ns > >>> | | > >>> ----- net_ns ---- > >>> > Is it possible, BTW? > >>> It yes, that is such construction valid? > >Looks like a mess, no. I'd expect there to be only one rpc.mountd > >running per network namespace. > > Then we have to prevent such situations somehow. > Or it is done already? If there's a way to prevent it, great, otherwise I think we just tell people not to do that, and make sure any distro scripts (or whatever) don't do that. Actually, my statement above isn't quite right: we do allow running multiple rpc.mountd processes in one network namespace (see the --num-threads option to rpc.mountd, which is sometimes necessary for performance). But they should all be in the same namespaces and be using the same configuration. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
