Re: Another try at LNFS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/05/2012 17:26, David Quigley wrote:
On 04/05/2012 13:15, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 13:02 -0400, David Quigley wrote:
Now that we're past the 3.4 merge window should I post the LNFS
modifications for review for when 3.5 rolls around?

The sooner the better. It looks as if there will be quite a bit of stuff
going into 3.5, so it would be nice to maximise our testing window.

Thanks!
  Trond

I have a mostly working copy for 3.2 which I can forward port but I'm
having an issue with it. The revalidate code changed at some point and
just to get things working I dropped a piece of code from the patch
set that I couldn't figure out how to transition to the new revalidate
code. Unfortunately this is the initial get of the security label so
the security label is invalid until the first cache invalidation. Any
suggestions on where to place this code? I can give you the original
code snippet when I get home that I dropped.

Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Looking at my patches it looks like nfs_lookup_revalidate was changed and at the time I couldn't figure out what it was changed to.

Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux