Hi, ----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:55 -0400, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Boaz: we do not any longer send a readdir index. We do send a > cookieverf. > > Uhh... That would be so broken, that I can't imagine that is true... I think you're misreading my statement. My intended meaning had to do with Ganesha's generator for the cookies themselves. It's not relevant. > > > Fist of all, I haven't established that the issue we're actually > observing is caused > > by the Linux client sending old cookies to readdir(something). > However, if it is, > > it's in no way better to try to make cookies "more persistent." Nor > should the Linux > > client be expecting it. The assumption is simply flawed. The > protocol introduced > > cookie verifier (a LONG time ago) for a reason. > > Bullshit... The cookie verifier is unimplementable. Feel free to try > or > to show me an implementation that works. However I refuse to waste > any > more of my time trying to make that crap work, having already wasted > several months of my life doing just that. There must be something I'm missing here, but ok. > > -- > Trond Myklebust > Linux NFS client maintainer > > NetApp > Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx > www.netapp.com -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
