Vivek Trivedi wrote: 204800 bytes (200.0KB) copied, 0.027074 seconds, 7.2MB/s Read speed for 200KB file is 7.2 MB 104857600 bytes (100.0MB) copied, 9.351221 seconds, 10.7MB/s Read speed for 100MB file is 10.7 MB As you see read speed for 200KB file is only 7.2MB/sec while it is 10.7 MB/sec when we read 100MB file. Why there is so much difference in read performance ? Is there any way to achieve high read speed for small files ? That seems excellent to me. 204800 bytes at 11213252 per sec would be 18.2 msec, so your per-file overhead is around 9 msec. The disk latency alone would normally be more than that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
