I am curious why such a message is required? Isn't the reason for having a default is so that the option does not need to specified? Thanx... ps -----Original Message----- From: linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Dickson Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:24 PM To: Linux NFS Mailing list Subject: [PATCH 1/1] nfsd: Warn when no servers are specified on the command line When the number of servers are not specified on the command, log a warning message that the default number of services will be started Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> --- utils/nfsd/nfsd.c | 7 +++++-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/utils/nfsd/nfsd.c b/utils/nfsd/nfsd.c index 8bc5d3a..c744ee1 100644 --- a/utils/nfsd/nfsd.c +++ b/utils/nfsd/nfsd.c @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) } } + xlog_open(progname); + if (optind < argc) { if ((count = atoi(argv[optind])) < 0) { /* insane # of servers */ @@ -203,10 +205,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) socket_up = 1; goto set_threads; } + } else { + xlog(L_WARNING, "No server number specified. '%d' nfsd will be started", + count); } - xlog_open(progname); - nfsd_enable_protos(&proto4, &proto6); if (!NFSCTL_TCPISSET(protobits)) { -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
