Thanks Bryan for reply.
Cent OS 6 is using 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 kernel.
My server is netapp filer.
I have increased timeout, but still same warning messages.
If I execute by using -f option, non-native 64 bit LFS locking
testcases are passing, but native post-LFS locking testcases still
give same warning messages
======================================
$ ./runtests -f /nfstests
Starting LOCKING tests: test directory (arg: -f)
Testing native post-LFS locking
Creating parent/child synchronization pipes.
Test #1 - Test regions of an unlocked file.
Parent: 1.1 - F_TEST [ 0, 1] PASSED.
Parent: 1.2 - F_TEST [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Parent: 1.3 - F_TEST [ 0,7fffffff] PASSED.
Parent: 1.4 - F_TEST [ 1, 1] PASSED.
Parent: 1.5 - F_TEST [ 1, ENDING] PASSED.
Parent: 1.6 - F_TEST [ 1,7fffffff] PASSED.
Parent: 1.7 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
Parent: 1.8 - F_TEST [7fffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
Parent: 1.9 - F_TEST [7fffffff,7fffffff] WARNING!
Parent: **** Expected EOVERFLOW, returned success...
Test #2 - Try to lock the whole file.
Parent: 2.0 - F_TLOCK [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.1 - F_TEST [ 0, 1] PASSED.
Child: 2.2 - F_TEST [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.3 - F_TEST [ 0,7fffffff] PASSED.
Child: 2.4 - F_TEST [ 1, 1] PASSED.
Child: 2.5 - F_TEST [ 1, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.6 - F_TEST [ 1,7fffffff] PASSED.
Child: 2.7 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
Child: 2.8 - F_TEST [7fffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.9 - F_TEST [7fffffff,7fffffff] WARNING!
Child: **** Expected EOVERFLOW, returned EACCES...
Parent: 2.10 - F_ULOCK [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Test #6 - Try to lock the MAXEOF byte.
Parent: 6.0 - F_TLOCK [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.1 - F_TEST [7ffffffe, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.2 - F_TEST [7ffffffe, 2] PASSED.
Child: 6.3 - F_TEST [7ffffffe, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 6.4 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.5 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 2] WARNING!
Child: **** Expected EOVERFLOW, returned EACCES...
Child: 6.6 - F_TEST [7fffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 6.7 - F_TEST [80000000, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 6.8 - F_TEST [80000000, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.9 - F_TEST [80000000,7fffffff] PASSED.
Child: 6.10 - F_TEST [80000000,80000000] PASSED.
Parent: 6.11 - F_ULOCK [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
** PARENT pass 1 results: 48/48 pass, 2/2 warn, 0/0 fail (pass/total).
** CHILD pass 1 results: 62/62 pass, 2/2 warn, 0/0 fail (pass/total).
Testing non-native 64 bit LFS locking
Creating parent/child synchronization pipes.
Test #1 - Test regions of an unlocked file.
Parent: 1.1 - F_TEST [ 0, 1] PASSED.
Parent: 1.2 - F_TEST [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Parent: 1.3 - F_TEST [ 0,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Parent: 1.4 - F_TEST [ 1, 1] PASSED.
Parent: 1.5 - F_TEST [ 1, ENDING] PASSED.
Parent: 1.6 - F_TEST [ 1,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Parent: 1.7 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, 1] PASSED.
Parent: 1.8 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
Parent: 1.9 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Test #2 - Try to lock the whole file.
Parent: 2.0 - F_TLOCK [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.1 - F_TEST [ 0, 1] PASSED.
Child: 2.2 - F_TEST [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.3 - F_TEST [ 0,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Child: 2.4 - F_TEST [ 1, 1] PASSED.
Child: 2.5 - F_TEST [ 1, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.6 - F_TEST [ 1,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Child: 2.7 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, 1] PASSED.
Child: 2.8 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 2.9 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Parent: 2.10 - F_ULOCK [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
Test #6 - Try to lock the MAXEOF byte.
Parent: 6.0 - F_TLOCK [7fffffffffffffff, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.1 - F_TEST [7ffffffffffffffe, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.2 - F_TEST [7ffffffffffffffe, 2] PASSED.
Child: 6.3 - F_TEST [7ffffffffffffffe, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 6.4 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.5 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, 2] PASSED.
Child: 6.6 - F_TEST [7fffffffffffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 6.7 - F_TEST [8000000000000000, ENDING] PASSED.
Child: 6.8 - F_TEST [8000000000000000, 1] PASSED.
Child: 6.9 - F_TEST [8000000000000000,7fffffffffffffff] PASSED.
Child: 6.10 - F_TEST [8000000000000000,8000000000000000] PASSED.
Parent: 6.11 - F_ULOCK [7fffffffffffffff, 1] PASSED.
======================================
Thanks,
Rahul
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 04:21 PM, Rahul Katariya wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I am using Cent OS 6 64 bit which supports NFS version 4.
>
>
> A few questions:
>
> - What kernel version is Cent OS 6 using? I'm running 3.2.7 (on Archlinux, though) and those tests pass...
> - Is the server Cent OS 6, too?
> - Do you still get the warnings if you run with -f instead of -t?
> - Have you tried increasing your "timeo" value? 7 seems somewhat low...
>
> My `mount` output looks like this:
> davros:/home/bjschuma/ on /nfs type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.122.1,mountvers=3,mountport=20048,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.122.1)
>
>
> - Bryan
>
>>
>> I ran cthon-nfs-tests on it.
>>
>> Although NFS version is 4 supported, I am using NFS 3 for mounting NFS share.
>>
>> Following are packages installed.
>> # rpm -qa |grep nfs
>> nfs-utils-1.2.2-7.el6.x86_64
>> nfs-utils-lib-1.1.5-1.el6.x86_64
>>
>> Mount shows following
>> # mount
>> nfs-server:/export/share/connectathon on /nfstestdir1 type nfs
>> (rw,intr,retrans=5,timeo=7,tcp,nfsvers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=10.10.10.1)
>>
>> Following is a nfs locking testcase result:
>>
>> [lock]$ ./runtests -t /nfstestdir1
>> Starting LOCKING tests: test directory (arg: -t)
>>
>> Testing native post-LFS locking
>>
>> Creating parent/child synchronization pipes.
>> =======================================================
>> Test #1 - Test regions of an unlocked file.
>> Parent: 1.1 - F_TEST [ 0, 1] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.2 - F_TEST [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.3 - F_TEST [ 0,7fffffff] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.4 - F_TEST [ 1, 1] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.5 - F_TEST [ 1, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.6 - F_TEST [ 1,7fffffff] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.7 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.8 - F_TEST [7fffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Parent: 1.9 - F_TEST [7fffffff,7fffffff] WARNING!
>> Parent: **** Expected EOVERFLOW, returned success...
>>
>> Test #2 - Try to lock the whole file.
>> Parent: 2.0 - F_TLOCK [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.1 - F_TEST [ 0, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.2 - F_TEST [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.3 - F_TEST [ 0,7fffffff] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.4 - F_TEST [ 1, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.5 - F_TEST [ 1, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.6 - F_TEST [ 1,7fffffff] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.7 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.8 - F_TEST [7fffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 2.9 - F_TEST [7fffffff,7fffffff] WARNING!
>> Child: **** Expected EOVERFLOW, returned EACCES...
>> Parent: 2.10 - F_ULOCK [ 0, ENDING] PASSED.
>>
>> Test #6 - Try to lock the MAXEOF byte.
>> Parent: 6.0 - F_TLOCK [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.1 - F_TEST [7ffffffe, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.2 - F_TEST [7ffffffe, 2] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.3 - F_TEST [7ffffffe, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.4 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.5 - F_TEST [7fffffff, 2] WARNING!
>> Child: **** Expected EOVERFLOW, returned EACCES...
>> Child: 6.6 - F_TEST [7fffffff, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.7 - F_TEST [80000000, ENDING] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.8 - F_TEST [80000000, 1] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.9 - F_TEST [80000000,7fffffff] PASSED.
>> Child: 6.10 - F_TEST [80000000,80000000] PASSED.
>> Parent: 6.11 - F_ULOCK [7fffffff, 1] PASSED.
>>
>> =======================================================
>>
>> Test#1 , Test#2 and Test#6 Shows warning in locking .. i.e.
>> Expected .something. and returned some-other-thing ..
>>
>> Are these locking well-known issues?
>>
>> Are there any patch available for the same? Are these serious warnings?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rahul
>> ｢鴈ｹｻ ｮ&ﾞ~ｺ&ｶ ｬ-+-ｱ鰡ｶ ･Swｮzﾋ>ｱﾊ穃饕z�g~ﾈｧｶ >｡ﾜｨ}ｩzｲﾆ zﾚ&j:+v?ｨｾ ｫ'�zZ+?ﾊ+zf｣｢ｷhs^ｧ~?ｭ?ﾛi鍗zｹ ｮw･｢ｸ?Tｨ隴ﾚ&｢)ﾟ｢ f
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
