On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:08:07PM +0100, steve wrote: > OK. I see what you mean. umask 0022 > So I can have a group rw with posix but not with nfs4_setfacl:-( > > That's on openSUSE who default to 0022. The default on Ubuntu is > 0002 so presumably we could have group rw over nfs4 there out of the > box? > > Is it a lot of work to implement umask override for nfs4? Or make it > an option perhaps? Two fulltime-kernel-hacker-week-equivalents? I'm not sure, I just made that up. It does appear that it's necessary to make v4 ACLs usable in a lot of cases. --b. > At the moment I'm using a big hammer and scanning the share every 4 > seconds to change the permissions of any files created there. My > other thought was to have the share on a different partition, umask > it to 0002 and export that. But these are workarounds. It would be > really good to have the nfs4 acls do it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
