Boaz Harrosh [bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > I think that both fixes to umount are important for future/backward > compatibility with Kernel, And general code resilience. > > But some kind sole should fix both breakages in /proc/mounts, for > sure. Would you know how to fix it? I guess, fixing the umount is needed and it is easy. I will send a fix. The kernel side is not as easy! The NFS4 mounts the root first then the exported path using subtree_mount() which seem to remove the actual string and replace it with a real path. We can save the devname somewhere and get it into nfs_show_devname(), but I am not sure that works. Thanks, Malahal. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
