Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: cleanup setting of default max_block_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



于 2012-2-4 4:49, J. Bruce Fields 写道:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 04:46:56PM -0500, bfields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:11:48AM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
   Should use target = i.totalram<<  (PAGE_SHIFT - 12);

   target = i.totalram<<  PAGE_SHIFT; and
   target<<= 12;
   means target = i.totalram<<  (PAGE_SHIFT + 12);

Yes, thanks for catching that.

Also, splitting up the calculation as I did above risks overflow at the
first step.

I'll fix that....

Here are the fixed patches.--b.

From 87b0fc7deb5feccf93b022f6a976e8441152dbb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "J. Bruce Fields"<bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:18:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: cleanup setting of default max_block_size

Move calculation of the default into a helper function.

Get rid of an unused variable "err" while we're there.

Thanks to Mi Jinlong for catching an arithmetic error in a previous
version.

Cc: Mi Jinlong<mijinlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields<bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
index eda7d7e..e9eb408 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
@@ -307,33 +307,37 @@ static void set_max_drc(void)
  	dprintk("%s nfsd_drc_max_mem %u \n", __func__, nfsd_drc_max_mem);
  }

-int nfsd_create_serv(void)
+static int nfsd_get_default_max_blksize(void)
  {
-	int err = 0;
+	struct sysinfo i;
+	unsigned long long target;
+	unsigned long ret;
+
+	si_meminfo(&i);
+	target = i.totalram<<  PAGE_SHIFT;
+	/*
+	 * Aim for 1/4096 of memory per thread This gives 1MB on 4Gig
+	 * machines, but only uses 32K on 128M machines.  Bottom out at
+	 * 8K on 32M and smaller.  Of course, this is only a default.
+	 */
+	target>>= 12;

   Why don't using target = i.totalram << (PAGE_SHIFT - 12) as before?
   The result of the two forms is more likely different.

   Is there some other reason ?

thanks,
Mi Jinlong


+
+	ret = NFSSVC_MAXBLKSIZE;
+	while (ret>  target&&  ret>= 8*1024*2)
+		ret /= 2;
+	return ret;
+}

+int nfsd_create_serv(void)
+{
  	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&nfsd_mutex));
  	if (nfsd_serv) {
  		svc_get(nfsd_serv);
  		return 0;
  	}
-	if (nfsd_max_blksize == 0) {
-		/* choose a suitable default */
-		struct sysinfo i;
-		si_meminfo(&i);
-		/* Aim for 1/4096 of memory per thread
-		 * This gives 1MB on 4Gig machines
-		 * But only uses 32K on 128M machines.
-		 * Bottom out at 8K on 32M and smaller.
-		 * Of course, this is only a default.
-		 */
-		nfsd_max_blksize = NFSSVC_MAXBLKSIZE;
-		i.totalram<<= PAGE_SHIFT - 12;
-		while (nfsd_max_blksize>  i.totalram&&
-		       nfsd_max_blksize>= 8*1024*2)
-			nfsd_max_blksize /= 2;
-	}
+	if (nfsd_max_blksize == 0)
+		nfsd_max_blksize = nfsd_get_default_max_blksize();
  	nfsd_reset_versions();
-
  	nfsd_serv = svc_create_pooled(&nfsd_program, nfsd_max_blksize,
  				      nfsd_last_thread, nfsd, THIS_MODULE);
  	if (nfsd_serv == NULL)
@@ -341,7 +345,7 @@ int nfsd_create_serv(void)

  	set_max_drc();
  	do_gettimeofday(&nfssvc_boot);		/* record boot time */
-	return err;
+	return 0;
  }

  int nfsd_nrpools(void)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux