On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:05 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > >> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 14:48 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 14:17 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>>> Hi- >>>>> >>>>> I think we should co-ordinate with Solaris on this administrative interface. Can we discuss in Santa Clara? >>>> >>>> Unless they have a strong argument for why this is a bad idea, I plan on >>>> just adding this to 3.4. There is no point in foot-dragging on this any >>>> more. >>> >>> No foot dragging. We just ask at the next convenient opportunity. I think they want to go with vers=41. >> >> "4.1" allows for easier visual and automated parsing of major vs minor >> version. In 8 years from now, I'd prefer to see 'vers=4.10' rather than >> 'vers=410' > > Fair enough, and I've made similar points to them in the past. But you should be having this conversation with the Solaris guys, not me. Can we have this discussion at Connectathon, when all interested parties will be in the room? That should still be enough time to allow you to submit this change for 3.4. > > (And by the way, you will probably need some adjustment to mount.nfs's string parsing logic as well). Well, it "just worked" for me! -dros
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
