J. Bruce Fields [bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > > I think so too. We think Volatile file handle support on the client side > > is simpler for our use case (read only NFS file systems) > > Won't it be confusing to applications if inode numbers change on > migration? Some applications do depends on stable inode numbers. We can't have VFH and stable inode numbers! We don't have any such apps in our environment. Mount option for VFH (use at your own risk) would work fine for us. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
