On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:33 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:04 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > > This is a cleanup patch. We don't need this reference anymore, because > > blocklayout pipes dentries now creates and destroys in per-net operations and > > on PipeFS mount/umount notification. > > Note that nfs4blocklayout_register_net() now returns 0 instead of -ENOENT in > > case of PipeFS superblock absence. This is ok, because blocklayout pipe dentry > > will be created on PipeFS mount event. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 9 +-------- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c > > index 322d920..2c70202 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c > > @@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4blocklayout_register_net(struct net *net, > > > > pipefs_sb = rpc_get_sb_net(net); > > if (!pipefs_sb) > > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); > > + return 0; > > This looks like a typo of some sort. The caller in > nfs4blocklayout_net_init() checks for IS_ERR(), not NULL. I'll just > remove this hunk... Never mind. I see what's going on now... It should be NULL, and not 0 for coding style reasons, though... -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
