On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:28:53PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 01/11/2012 09:44 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: > >> > >> Understood that it may depend on where things stand in April, but: what > >> specifically do you think will be likely to require the attention of a > >> wider group of linux filesystem developers (ass opposed to just nfs > >> developers)? > > > > I have nothing specific at this time. My thinking was to present the > > what's and why's > > of the prerequisites in high level and maybe provide an example. > > > > At the time there where some reservations from people about some of the > added hooks and vectors. If there are still, we would like to hear them > and either address them or argue their validity. OK. > I think this talk should be expanded with Jeff's suggestions. here: > > - RichACLs > > - Share/Deny mode support on open > > - mandatory locking that doesn't rely on weirdo file modes ... > So the broader topic can be: > "The things we want/need from the Kernel to make it exportable" Agreed that no matter where we are there will likely be a long list of thorny questions of that sort.... --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html