On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:55 -0500, Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:41:47AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > Instead of hacking specific service names into gss_encode_v1_msg, we should > > just allow the caller to specify the service name explicitly. > > Just curious: do you have some callers in mind he will need different > service names? Not for now, but I do expect that we might want to add lockd to the list of RPCSEC_GSS-enabled services some day. > (But I agree reagardless that this is the more logical layering; fwiw: > > Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
