RE: copy offload support in Linux - new system call needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> How would the server know? I suggest we deal with this by adding an
> ioctl() to allow the application to poll for progress: I'm assuming now

Why not support something like the async-iocb?


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux