Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To avoid other people further wasting their and your time on > exactly the same thing future, how something like the following > patch, based on your comment in: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/40370 > > ...and, if that's acceptable, is it worthwhile doing for the > other file systems which are likewise currently vulnerable when > abused by broken layered file systems? Also, this may get fixed by Al's atomic open patches - but obviously it hasn't been yet... > Don't oops when abused by broken layered file systems > > Signed-off-by: Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> It's also worth printing a message - this *is* a kernel bug of some description if it happens. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
