Re: pnfs git tree status pnfs-all-3.1-2011-11-14 pnfs-all-3.2-rc1-2011-11-14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-11-14 19:23, Peng Tao wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I merged the following patches into pnfs-all-3.1-2011-11-14
>> and rebased the tree onto v3.2-rc1 as pnfs-all-3.2-rc1-2011-11-14.
>>
>> pnfs-block:
>>  Peng Tao         e5b35df pnfsblock: cleanup bl_mark_sectors_init
>>  Peng Tao         60d5135 pnfsblock: move find lock page logic out of bl_write_pagelist
>>  Peng Tao         ab0c07d pnfsblock: set read/write tk_status to pnfs_error
>>  Peng Tao         85e8c84 pnfsblock: remove rpc_call_ops from struct parallel_io
>>  Peng Tao         7c93c37 pnfsblock: clean up _add_entry
>>  Peng Tao         ec11faf pnfsblock: alloc short extent before submit bio
> Thanks, Benny. It seems this one is still missing.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg25358.html
> 
> Would you please merge it as well? verg keeps dropping the patch so I
> sent it as an attachment. Did you get it?

Argh, sorry, it's actually already merged. It's just that my
reporting script happened to miss it.
657c2f4 pnfsblock: acquire im_lock in _preload_range

> 
> BTW, checkpatch.pl doesn't complain anything on the patch:
> $./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0002-pnfsblock-acquire-im_lock-in-_preload_range.patch
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 36 lines checked
> 
> 0002-pnfsblock-acquire-im_lock-in-_preload_range.patch has no obvious
> style problems and is ready for submission.
> 
> 
>>
>> pnfsd:
>>  Boaz Harrosh     5e57e48 SQUASHME: pnfsd: Don't call fs_layout_return on a none-file
>>
>> spnfs-block:
>>  Benny Halevy     400ab8f SQUASHME: spnfs-block: fix oops in device_slice
>>  Benny Halevy     bd6bc0a SQUASHME: spnfs-block: add dprints for device_slice
>>
>> Both versions pass connectathon tests against pnfsd-lexp server using the files layout.
>>
>> Block layout fails as the server ctl process crashes as follows:
> Was it working before?
> 

It's been languished for quite a while so the answer is
that it worked before, once upon a time.

Benny

> Thanks,
> Tao
>>
>> kernel: nfsv4 compound op #2/2: 47 (OP_GETDEVICEINFO)
>> kernel: nfsd4_getdevinfo: layout_type 3 dev_id 28d:1f maxcnt 135168
>> kernel: nfsd4_getdevinfo: sb ffff88002c535cd0
>> kernel: pnfs_set_device_notify: -->
>> kernel: renewing client (clientid 4ec13510/00000003)
>> kernel: pnfs_set_device_notify: Incr device count (clnt ffff88002d310000) to 2
>> kernel: nfsd4_encode_getdevinfo: err 0
>> kernel: device_slice: dev_id=0:31
>> kernel: device_slice: ret=1
>> kernel: ctl[1028]: segfault at 497 ip 00007f74b7909f24 sp 00007fffd2a43948 error 4 in libc-2.13.90.so[7f74b788d000+192000]
>>
>> Benny
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux