Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/7] Volatile Filehandle Client-side Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:45:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
> Also, could a re-looked-up file be considered sufficiently safe to use
> if all the attributes matched?
> 
> (I guess not: inode numbers, change attributes, etc., could agree by
> coincidence, so it would never be completely reliable.)
> 

We thought of doing something like that, but like you said it's not a 
guarantee. That was part of the reason why we went with the mount option.
By using it, the user will assume that whatever files the re-look-ups return
are safe/correct.

-Matt Treinish

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux