From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Lockowners are looked up by file as well as by owner, but we were
forgetting to do a comparison on the file. This could cause an
incorrect result from lockt.
(Note looking up the inode from the lockowner is pretty awkward here.
The data structures need fixing.)
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 47e94e3..5abced7 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3809,16 +3809,29 @@ nevermind:
deny->ld_type = NFS4_WRITE_LT;
}
+static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid, struct xdr_netobj *owner)
+{
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
+
+ if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
+ return false;
+ lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
+ return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;
+}
+
static struct nfs4_lockowner *
find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
struct xdr_netobj *owner)
{
unsigned int hashval = lock_ownerstr_hashval(inode, clid->cl_id, owner);
+ struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
struct nfs4_stateowner *op;
list_for_each_entry(op, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
- if (same_owner_str(op, owner, clid))
- return lockowner(op);
+ lo = lockowner(op);
+ if (same_lockowner_ino(lo, inode, clid, owner))
+ return lo;
}
return NULL;
}
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
