Re: [BUG?] Maybe NFS bug since 2.6.37 on SPARC64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I suspect some kind of timing problem, where the network interface hasn't

> come up yet at the time the portmap request is made.  What does your nfsroot
> kernel option look like?  What happens if you add ",port=2049" to the 
> end of
> your nfsroot kernel option?

That's my kernel line (and it's exactly the same for all kernel versions I used):
root=/dev/nfs rw nfsroot=137.226.167.241:/srv/nfs/cluster2 ip=137.226.167.242::137.226.167.225:255.255.255.224:cluster2:eth0:off nfsrootdebug
(I know that nfsrootdebug isn't available in older kernels but it doesn't matter...)

With ",port=2049" I get this from linux-2.6.29.4:
[  252.932407] IP-Config: Complete:
[  252.932476]      device=eth0, addr=137.226.167.242, mask=255.255.255.224, gw=137.226.167.225,
[  252.932680]      host=cluster2, domain=, nis-domain=(none),
[  252.932794]      bootserver=255.255.255.255, rootserver=137.226.167.241, rootpath=
[  252.933230] Root-NFS: nfsroot=/srv/nfs/cluster2,port=2049
[  252.933523] NFS: nfs mount opts='udp,port=2049,nolock,addr=137.226.167.241'
[  252.933583] NFS:   parsing nfs mount option 'udp'
[  252.933621] NFS:   parsing nfs mount option 'port=2049'
[  252.933675] NFS:   parsing nfs mount option 'nolock'
[  252.933722] NFS:   parsing nfs mount option 'addr=137.226.167.241'
[  252.933787] NFS: MNTPATH: '/srv/nfs/cluster2'
[  252.933823] NFS: sending MNT request for 137.226.167.241:/srv/nfs/cluster2
[  254.038874] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx
[  254.059251] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
[  288.023684] NFS: failed to create MNT RPC client, status=-60
[  288.023793] NFS: unable to mount server 137.226.167.241, error -60
[  288.023929] VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
[  288.024092] VFS: Insert root floppy and press ENTER

So the result is the same as before...
In the past I also tried higher "timeo" and I think higher "retrans" values but also without a positive effect...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux