I think this is still needed, isn't it? I haven't tried compiling
nfs-for-next but I don't see a fix for it in there.
From: Jim Rees <rees@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:06:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Silence compiler warning
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c: In function ‘do_callback_layoutrecall’:
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c:115:26: warning: ‘lo’ may be used uninitialized in this function
No functional change. If no layout is found, we'll return before using
"lo".
Signed-off-by: Jim Rees <rees@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
index 43926ad..f384eb1 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ static u32 initiate_file_draining(struct nfs_client *clp,
struct cb_layoutrecallargs *args)
{
struct nfs_server *server;
- struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
- struct inode *ino;
+ struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NULL;
+ struct inode *ino = NULL;
bool found = false;
u32 rv = NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT;
LIST_HEAD(free_me_list);
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
