On 10/31/2011 10:49 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 10/29/2011 10:24 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> Hi Boaz, >> >> Have you tested these patches in linux-next? If so, I can pull them in >> from open-osd.org and send them with the next merge. If not, I think >> patches (as soon as possible!) would be better. I'll commit them to >> nfs-for-next, and we can try to get them in... >> >> Cheers >> Trond >> > > Hi Trond. > > These patches where in next since before the BAT when I sent them to the > list, then based on my exofs tree. I have now rebased on Linus master > based on my pull bits and Yours, and again they where in next since > Thursday. But the big question is did we have linux-next in that time > frame because I thought Stephen was on vacation and the last linux-next > was around Oct 20th? > > Any way both our bits where in Linux next since Oct 16. The patches are > rebased but completely unchanged. > > Is there some tests I should make, other then compile oldmodconfig x86_64 > and x86_32? I wish I had setup for more compilers. > > But I'd say the risk is very low since the exact patches did sit in next. > And after rebase I run a compile and a short test run. > > Any way I can post the patches. Give me an hour > Boaz > Hi trond I just re-checked. Compiled both i386 an x86_64 allmodconfig and even merge with latest linus tree. I sign on these patches. Again they were in linux-next as is, untouched based on exofs tree. And now based on Linus/master [f362f98] They compile and run. I'll re-post them just in case you decide to need them, as reply to this mail. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
