Hi, Trond, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Myklebust, Trond <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Benny Halevy [mailto:bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 8:58 AM >> To: Peng Tao >> Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Myklebust, Trond; Peng Tao >> Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] nfs41: handle BLK_LAYOUT CB_RECALL_ANY >> >> On 2011-10-24 05:25, Peng Tao wrote: >> > Hi, Trond and Benny, >> > >> > The patch depends on the pnfs private workqueue for now. So I want > to >> > consult you about where to put the work. Is pnfs private workqueue >> > dropped? If yes, where should I put this kind of work? >> >> I'll defer this to Trond. >> I'm OK with having a workqueue for pnfs. > > I've already commented on this: I see no justification whatsoever for a > private pnfs workqueue. OK. Thanks a lot for confirming it. I think I can just change this one to use the system wq. Will send an updated patch. -- Thanks, Tao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
