Re: [RFC] nfsd4: DEBUG: XDR_ERROR()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/2011 05:09 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> 
> I agree with all of the above but its a project larger than I can
> chew right now.  This patch just improves the existing mechanism, for
> development use, to help catch parser bugs rather than actual xdr errors.
> 
<>

>>>  
>>> +#define XDR_ERROR()	do {			\
>>> +	dprintk("NFSD: xdr error (%s:%d)\n",	\
>>> +			__FILE__, __LINE__);	\
>>> +	goto xdr_error;				\
>>> +} while (0)
>>> +

What about a compromise:

+#define GOTO_XDR_ERROR()	do {			\
+	dprintk("NFSD: xdr error (%s:%d)\n",	\
+			__FILE__, __LINE__);	\
+	goto xdr_error;				\
+} while (0)

or even:

+#define XDR_ERROR_GOTO(xdr_error)	do {	\
+	dprintk("NFSD: xdr error (%s:%d)\n",	\
+			__FILE__, __LINE__);	\
+	goto xdr_error;				\
+} while (0)

and XDR_ERROR_GOTO(xdr_error) every where.

So the patch below stays exactly the same size
but the goto is not masked out, and no one can
complain about things happening hidden underground.

Just My $0.017
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux