28.10.2011 01:30, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:17:18PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
svc_unregister() call have to be removed from svc_destroy() since it will be
called in sv_shutdown callback.
It would be clearer that you're *moving* this if this were merged with
the following patch. And without doing that the series isn't quite
bisectable, unless I'm missing something.
Yes, you are right. Will resend new version soon.
--b.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index 918edc3..407462f 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ svc_destroy(struct svc_serv *serv)
if (svc_serv_is_pooled(serv))
svc_pool_map_put();
- svc_unregister(serv);
kfree(serv->sv_pools);
kfree(serv);
}
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
