On 10/27/2011 01:34 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:16:08PM -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 10/25/2011 05:19 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> Boaz Harrosh (1): >>> nfsd4: fix failure to end nfsd4 grace period >>> >> >> Bruce hi. >> >> As I recall this failure I have experienced in early stages of the >> 3.1-rcX series. I admit that I always run with Benny's pnfs tree, >> but I do not think it is patches that Benny added from the 3.2 set >> I think it is breakage introduced by the 3.1 merge window. >> >> Therefor I think that this patch must be sent to Stable@ otherwise >> surly 3.1 Kernel users are to hit it. (You can escapee it) > > We need to test it, but I think you're probably correct, > 6577aac01f00636c16cd583c30bd4dedf18475d5 "nfsd4: fix failure to end > nfsd4 grace period" should have been tagged for stable. Does that also > require any previous patches? (E.g. > 48483bf23a568f3ef4cc7ad2c8f1a082f10ad0e7 "nfsd4: simplify recovery dir > setting"?) > right, and all for that dmesg print. But yes! Well the 3.1 Kernel without them gets stuck. I guess you need to experiment with what would be the minimal patchset needed for 3.1 . Tell me if you need help testing that the damage has gone. But basically I have a script (4 years old) that does: server: service nfs stop/start client: mount back to back, The client gets stuck forever. > --b. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
