Benny what is the state of the PNFSD tree? Can you sign on it's stability for a large scale testing or should I be using the nfsd-3.1 based tree? As far as I could see. The last tree that did not have nfsd-3.2 new state patches was pnfs-all-3.1-rc8-2011-10-06. pnfs-all-3.1-rc9-2011-10-17 Had some of them, but I guess not the major ones. (Should I test with this one?) And pnfs-all-3.1-rc10-2011-10-18 (pnfs/pnfs-all-latest) has all of them. Is it stable? My last heavy testing was actually on pnfs-all-3.1-rc6-2011-09-20. If I diff that with pnfs-all-3.1-rc8-2011-10-06 on fs/nfsd/ I can still see huge amount of for-nfsd-v3.2 changes. I know you have found some bugs, So I guess I'll stick with the v3.1-rc6-pnfs based tree for the Server and v3.1 release Kernel + ore-v3.2 patches. Do you think you will release a 3.1 based pnfs tree that is completely based on the v3.1-nfsd version and the old pnfs tree, without any for-v3.2-pnfsd patches? Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
