On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:20:21 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:02:56PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > +#define RICHACL_XATTR "system.richacl"
> > +
> > +struct richace_xattr {
> > + __le16 e_type;
> > + __le16 e_flags;
> > + __le32 e_mask;
> > + __le32 e_id;
> > + char e_who[0];
> > +};
>
> Does it really make sense to use a string here just to pick between the
> three choices OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@? Why not just another small
> integer? Is the goal to expand this somehow eventually?
I guess Andreas wanted the disk layout to be able to store user@domain
format if needed. That should make the layout flexible enough so that
we won't have to add another xattr later.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
