Re: [PATCH 03/25] nfsd4: extend state lock over seqid replay logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:18:48AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 09:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:55:56PM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> >> I'm getting the following warning that I was able to bisect to this patch:
> > 
> > I suspect this may fix it.  (Untested.)
> 
> Yeah, that seems to fix it.  Thanks!

Thanks for the testing; applying for 3.2.--b.

> > 
> > --b.
> > 
> > commit 8da87285a245c82d23183414cec7069f18721afd
> > Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Tue Sep 27 21:42:29 2011 -0400
> > 
> >     nfsd4: fix state lock usage in LOCKU
> >     
> >     In commit 5ec094c1096ab3bb795651855d53f18daa26afde "nfsd4: extend state
> >     lock over seqid replay logic" I modified the exit logic of all the
> >     seqid-based procedures except nfsd4_locku().  Fix the oversight.
> >     
> >     The result of the bug was a double-unlock while handling the LOCKU
> >     procedure, and a warning like:
> >     
> >     [  142.150014] WARNING: at kernel/mutex-debug.c:78 debug_mutex_unlock+0xda/0xe0()
> >     ...
> >     [  142.152927] Pid: 742, comm: nfsd Not tainted 3.1.0-rc1-SLIM+ #9
> >     [  142.152927] Call Trace:
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff8105fa4f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff8105faaa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff810960ca>] debug_mutex_unlock+0xda/0xe0
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff813e4200>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x80/0x140
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff813e42ce>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa03bd3f5>] nfs4_lock_state+0x35/0x40 [nfsd]
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa03b0b71>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x2a1/0x690
> >     [nfsd]
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa039f9fb>] nfsd_dispatch+0xeb/0x230 [nfsd]
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa02b1055>] svc_process_common+0x345/0x690
> >     [sunrpc]
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff81058d10>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x280/0x280
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa02b16e2>] svc_process+0x102/0x150 [sunrpc]
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa039f0bd>] nfsd+0xbd/0x160 [nfsd]
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffffa039f000>] ? 0xffffffffa039efff
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff8108230c>] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff813e8694>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff81082280>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190
> >     [  142.152927]  [<ffffffff813e8690>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> >     
> >     Reported-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 752c0f8..9daf254 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -4199,7 +4199,8 @@ nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> >  	memcpy(&locku->lu_stateid, &stp->st_stid.sc_stateid, sizeof(stateid_t));
> >  
> >  out:
> > -	nfs4_unlock_state();
> > +	if (!cstate->replay_owner)
> > +		nfs4_unlock_state();
> >  	return status;
> >  
> >  out_nfserr:
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux