Trond Myklebust wrote: On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 23:18 -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@xxxxxxxxx> > > For layoutdriver io done functions, default workqueue is not a good place as > the code is executed in IO path. So add a pnfs private workqueue to handle > them. > > Also change block and object layout code to make use of this private > workqueue. > Wait, what???? Why is the I/O path (i.e. the nfsiod queue) inappropriate for layoutdriver io_done functions? I thought you were the one who asked for this, here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg22771.html But looking back on it now, the IO path has changed and I can't tell if the argument still holds. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
