Re: [PATCH 2/3] pNFS: introduce pnfs private workqueue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-09-10 10:41, Jim Rees wrote:
> From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi, I have a few comments inline below.
Otherwise, the direction and the patch looks good.

> 
> For layoutdriver io done functions, default workqueue is not a good place as
> the code is executed in IO path. So add a pnfs private workqueue to handle
> them.
> 
> Also change block and object layout code to make use of this private
> workqueue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <peng_tao@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Rees <rees@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c |   17 ++++++++---
>  fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c     |    8 ++++++
>  fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c     |    4 +-
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c                    |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.h                    |    4 +++
>  5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
> index dc23833..51f70f0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ bl_end_par_io_read(void *data)
>  	struct nfs_read_data *rdata = data;
>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&rdata->task.u.tk_work, bl_read_cleanup);
> -	schedule_work(&rdata->task.u.tk_work);
> +	pnfsiod_queue_work(&rdata->task.u.tk_work);
>  }
>  
>  /* We don't want normal .rpc_call_done callback used, so we replace it
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static void bl_end_par_io_write(void *data)
>  	wdata->task.tk_status = 0;
>  	wdata->verf.committed = NFS_FILE_SYNC;
>  	INIT_WORK(&wdata->task.u.tk_work, bl_write_cleanup);
> -	schedule_work(&wdata->task.u.tk_work);
> +	pnfsiod_queue_work(&wdata->task.u.tk_work);
>  }
>  
>  /* FIXME STUB - mark intersection of layout and page as bad, so is not
> @@ -981,29 +981,35 @@ static int __init nfs4blocklayout_init(void)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	ret = pnfsiod_start();
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_remove;
> +
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&bl_wq);
>  
>  	mnt = rpc_get_mount();
>  	if (IS_ERR(mnt)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(mnt);
> -		goto out_remove;
> +		goto out_stop;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = vfs_path_lookup(mnt->mnt_root,
>  			      mnt,
>  			      NFS_PIPE_DIRNAME, 0, &path);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out_remove;
> +		goto out_stop;
>  
>  	bl_device_pipe = rpc_mkpipe(path.dentry, "blocklayout", NULL,
>  				    &bl_upcall_ops, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(bl_device_pipe)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(bl_device_pipe);
> -		goto out_remove;
> +		goto out_stop;
>  	}
>  out:
>  	return ret;
>  
> +out_stop:
> +	pnfsiod_stop();
>  out_remove:
>  	pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(&blocklayout_type);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -1015,6 +1021,7 @@ static void __exit nfs4blocklayout_exit(void)
>  	       __func__);
>  
>  	pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(&blocklayout_type);
> +	pnfsiod_stop();
>  	rpc_unlink(bl_device_pipe);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
> index d0cda12..f28013f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
> @@ -1042,7 +1042,14 @@ static int __init
>  objlayout_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret = pnfs_register_layoutdriver(&objlayout_type);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
>  
> +	ret = pnfsiod_start();
> +	if (ret)
> +		pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(&objlayout_type);
> +
> +out:
>  	if (ret)
>  		printk(KERN_INFO
>  			"%s: Registering OSD pNFS Layout Driver failed: error=%d\n",
> @@ -1057,6 +1064,7 @@ static void __exit
>  objlayout_exit(void)
>  {
>  	pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(&objlayout_type);
> +	pnfsiod_stop();
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Unregistered OSD pNFS Layout Driver\n",
>  	       __func__);
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c
> index 1d06f8e..f7c6c21 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ objlayout_read_done(struct objlayout_io_state *state, ssize_t status, bool sync)
>  		pnfs_ld_read_done(rdata);
>  	else {
>  		INIT_WORK(&rdata->task.u.tk_work, _rpc_read_complete);
> -		schedule_work(&rdata->task.u.tk_work);
> +		pnfsiod_queue_work(&rdata->task.u.tk_work);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ objlayout_write_done(struct objlayout_io_state *state, ssize_t status,
>  		pnfs_ld_write_done(wdata);
>  	else {
>  		INIT_WORK(&wdata->task.u.tk_work, _rpc_write_complete);
> -		schedule_work(&wdata->task.u.tk_work);
> +		pnfsiod_queue_work(&wdata->task.u.tk_work);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index e550e88..5ac7a78 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>  /* Locking:
>   *
>   * pnfs_spinlock:
> - *      protects pnfs_modules_tbl.
> + *      protects pnfs_modules_tbl, pnfsiod_workqueue and pnfsiod_users.
>   */
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pnfs_spinlock);
>  
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pnfs_spinlock);
>   */
>  static LIST_HEAD(pnfs_modules_tbl);
>  
> +static struct workqueue_struct *pnfsiod_workqueue;
> +static int pnfsiod_users = 0;

There's no need to initialize static variables to zero.

> +
>  /* Return the registered pnfs layout driver module matching given id */
>  static struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *
>  find_pnfs_driver_locked(u32 id)
> @@ -1478,3 +1481,50 @@ out:
>  	dprintk("<-- %s status %d\n", __func__, status);
>  	return status;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * start up the pnfsiod workqueue
> + */
> +int pnfsiod_start(void)
> +{
> +	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> +	dprintk("RPC:       creating workqueue pnfsiod\n");

hmm, s/RPC/NFS/ this is not the RPC module any more :)
looks like a cut'n'paste from rpciod_start...

> +	wq = alloc_workqueue("pnfsiod", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> +	if (wq == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	spin_lock(&pnfs_spinlock);
> +	pnfsiod_users++;
> +	if (pnfsiod_workqueue == NULL) {
> +		pnfsiod_workqueue = wq;
> +	} else {
> +		destroy_workqueue(wq);
> +	}

The curly braces in this statement are an overkill
(and deviation from CodingStyle)

> +	spin_unlock(&pnfs_spinlock);
> +	return 0;

although this way of accounting is ultimately simple
it's wasteful and since we're not really expecting any concurrent
calls to this function. I'd consider coding this it as follows:

	atomic_inc(&pnfsiod_users);
	if (pnfsiod_workqueue == NULL) {
		wq = alloc_workqueue("pnfsiod", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
		if (wq == NULL)
			return -ENOMEM;
		spin_lock(&pnfs_spinlock);
		if (pnfsiod_workqueue == NULL)
			pnfsiod_workqueue = wq;
		else
			destroy_workqueue(wq);
		spin_unlock(&pnfs_spinlock);
	}

	return 0;

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfsiod_start);
> +
> +/*
> + * Destroy the pnfsiod workqueue
> + */
> +void pnfsiod_stop(void)
> +{
> +	struct workqueue_struct *wq = NULL;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&pnfs_spinlock);
> +	pnfsiod_users--;
> +	if (pnfsiod_users == 0) {
> +		wq = pnfsiod_workqueue;
> +		pnfsiod_workqueue = NULL;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&pnfs_spinlock);
> +	if (wq)
> +		destroy_workqueue(wq);

and continuing my proposal from above:

	if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&pnfsiod_users)) {
		wq = pnfsiod_workqueue;
		pnfsiod_workqueue = NULL;
		spin_unlock(&pnfs_spinlock);
	}
	if (wq)
		destroy_workqueue(wq);

Benny

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfsiod_stop);
> +
> +void pnfsiod_queue_work(struct work_struct* work)
> +{
> +	queue_work(pnfsiod_workqueue, work);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfsiod_queue_work);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> index 01cbfd5..bc1eed5 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> @@ -165,6 +165,10 @@ extern int nfs4_proc_layoutget(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp);
>  extern int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp);
>  
>  /* pnfs.c */
> +int pnfsiod_start(void);
> +void pnfsiod_stop(void);
> +void pnfsiod_queue_work(struct work_struct* work);
> +
>  void get_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo);
>  void put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg);
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux