On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:15:50PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > I confess I haven't investigated this direction at > all yet. Is it correct that your previous objection was > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-10/msg00455.html > and the direct-IO patchset you were thinking of was > http://copilotco.com/mail-archives/linux-kernel.2009/msg87176.html ? Yes. > If so, are you suggesting that instead of swap_readpage and > swap_writepage I look into what is required for swap to use ->readpage > method and ->direct_IO aops? The equivalent of ->direct_IO should be used for both reads and writes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
