Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > + retval = ext4_set_richacl(handle, inode, acl); > + ext4_journal_stop(handle); > + if (retval == ENOSPC && ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries)) > + goto retry; Should that be -ENOSPC? I do wonder, why does ext4 need to know about richacls at all? Surely, as far as ext4 is concerned, they should be seen as xattrs? If ext4 needs a mark on disk to say it supports richacls, then why can't that simply be the presence or lack thereof of a richacl on the root dir? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
