On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 07:04 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:29:58 -0700 (PDT) > > > >> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:26:33 +0100 > >> > >>> This is v3 of my series to enable visibility into SKB paged fragment's > >> > >> Please tone down the patch count :-/ I'm not going to review anything more > >> than ~20 or so patches at a time from any one person. > > > > Also none of your patches will even apply to net-next GIT since nearly > > all the ethernet drivers have been moved under drivers/net/ethernet > > Ian, please acknowledge my grievances here. I see you replying to other > people, but not to me and I'm the one who has to process all of this > stuff eventually. Sorry, I thought I had replied to you first, did it go missing? > If you want this series to be taken seriously: > > 1) Make your patches against net-next GIT, none of your driver patches will > apply because they have all been moved around to different locations > under drivers/net > 2) Submit this in a _SANE_ way. This means, get the first patch that adds > the new interfaces approved and merged. Then slowly and carefuly submit > small, reasonably sized, sets of patches that convert the drivers over. That all makes sense, I'll do it that way. > Otherwise there is no way I'm even looking at this stuff, let alone actually > apply it. > Realize that every time you patch bomb rediculiously like this I have > to click and classify every single patch in your bomb at > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ Ah, right, I hadn't considered the patchwork thing, I'm very sorry about that! Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
